Q. NO 1
Discuss Pope as a satirist.
Or
Pope is a conscious artist of techniques of satire. Discuss.
Or
Examine Pope as a Moralist.
Or
Discuss Pope a social reformer.
Or
“Every satirist is an idealist at heart”. How far it is true about Pope?
In “The Rope of the Lock” Pope
exposes the artificial and hollow life of 18th century men and
women. He paints it with humorous and delicate satire. Satire is the major
stylistic device which Pope has used to
create the desired impact. This satire is not directed against any
individual but against the follies and vanities in general
of fashionable men and women of Pope’s age.
Pope started his poem
with the object to reconcile two quarreling families but as the poem
progressed; he forgot his original intentions and opened an attack on female
follies and vanities. Belinda is not Arabella Fermore, she represents the fashionable
ladies of the time and through her the follies and vanities of the whole sex
are satirized. Similarly, Baron represents not Peter alone but is a
representative of the whole aristocratic gentlemen of that age.
In “The Rape of the Lock” Pope satirizes at
the vanities , follies, frivolities,
shallowness , hypocrisy , self-embellishment ,
idleness
and false ideas of honour of eighteen century. He uses
satire along with its several shades to achieve the desired aim. It is meant to
amuse and instruct at the same time. In the result, Pope’s satire is least
destructive. He is a satirist with a definite moral purpose.
The very opening lines,
“What dire offences from amorous causes springs?
What mighty contests rise from trivial things’?
Pope ironically shows
the prevailing moral bankruptcy and artificiality. Belinda’s long and laborious preparations in
toilet show her pride and vanity. Pope
brings out forcefully the obdurate female
pride as well as vanity of his age through his portrait of Belinda and her conduct. The ceremony of her
embellishment is described like a religious ritual. The details of the objects
are given in a comic way. The comparison of Belinda
with a goddess underlines the hollowness of the age. Puffs, powders and love
letters all these weapons are placed side by side with Bible to produce
anticlimax effect. The intention there is to satire on the vanities and false
moral standards of eighteen century women. Pope
is both a satirist and a moralist.
Petty affairs were given greater importance than the solemn
and moral ones. This shows the reversal of values and standards. The death of
lap dog or breaking of a fragile china jar is as serious a matter as the death
of a husband. The ethics of eighteen century English were obviously in a sad
and rotten state, which was severely satirized by Pope
in “The Rape of the Lock”.
The leading negative trends
and attitudes of 18th century men and women are the subject matter
of Pope’s “The Rape of the Lock”. These
trends are exposed in a satirical way. It is commonly known that real purpose
of satire is the amendment of vices by correction. Accordingly, Pope’s satire
is a nice criticism of life and exposure of human weakness, follies,
absurdities and shortcomings. He uses humour,
wit, anticlimax, anti-thesis , metamorphosis , hyperbole ,sarcasm , lampoon ,mockery , ridicule, innuendo and irony with great skill to achieve his goal,
i.e. his moral end. The distinguishing aspect of Pope's satire is that it operates at three levels,
exposure, laughter and instruction.
By the use of different other expressions Pope has achieved his moral purpose. His mock epic
is a nice piece of social criticism. His satire is evident in the portrait of Belinda's character. She is called as the “fairest of mortals" “goddess” and “the rival of beam of the sun”. The only intention is
to mock at the lady. Another example of Pope's satire can be
seen in the description of the “cave of spleen”. The goddess of spleen is a
representative figure of 18th century women.
In short, it becomes clear without any doubt that “The Rape of the Lock” is a bitter and realistic
satire on 18th century aristocratic circle. Pope's purpose was not confined to mere condemnation and
entertainment. He was a true humanist who always aimed at moral reformation.
His noble cause is to establish the superiority of sane values. It is true that
he has exposed the moral degeneration in a bitter manner but his satire is
least destructive. He is a great artist and moralist who have wanted to reform
the society for better.
0 comments:
Post a Comment